Newsom Champions Global Climate Action as Trump and GOP Wrecked Environmental Protections

As the climate crisis intensifies, the contrast between California Governor Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump reveals a defining choice for America’s future. One leader builds global coalitions to protect the planet. The other—backed by a Republican Party in lockstep—has dismantled the very protections millions of Americans rely on to breathe clean air, drink safe water, and survive extreme weather. The damage is real. But so is the opportunity to rise.

Newsom is currently in Brazil attending the COP30 United Nations Climate Conference. His trip has drawn criticism for its carbon footprint. However, critics overlook a more profound truth: Newsom isn’t attending a ceremonial summit. He’s leading California’s delegation to forge climate partnerships, support Indigenous communities, and showcase a clean energy transition that could save lives. “We persist, and we thrive,” Newsom declared—stepping into the diplomatic vacuum left by Trump’s refusal to send senior officials.

Trump’s climate legacy is a scorched-earth campaign against environmental safeguards. His administration withdrew from the Paris Agreement, repealed the Clean Power Plan, eliminated clean energy tax credits, and expanded fossil fuel drilling. In 2025, House Republicans passed the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which gutted federal climate programs, repealed electric vehicle incentives, and stripped the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of its authority to regulate greenhouse gases. Senate Republicans blocked climate resilience funding, slashed wildfire prevention budgets, and confirmed judges hostile to environmental protections.

The most devastating impacts are felt in the air Americans breathe. Trump’s EPA rolled back fuel efficiency standards, locking in dirtier vehicles and adding $310 billion in fuel costs for working families. His administration repealed mercury and toxic water rules for coal plants, exposing children and seniors to poisons once considered unthinkable. And when the EPA’s legal mandate to regulate climate pollutants stood in their way, they tried to erase it—proposing to revoke the Endangerment Finding itself. The GOP didn’t flinch. They backed every move. They reversed refrigerant phaseouts, disrupted clean industry transitions, and hollowed out the EPA’s enforcement power.

The consequences are staggering—and deeply personal. Trump’s EPA exempted 50 chemical plants from toxic air rules, delaying enforcement that would have cut 6,200 tons of cancer-causing emissions annually. Communities in 13 states now face elevated cancer risks—many of them low-income, rural, and historically neglected. After initially supporting a bipartisan phaseout of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Trump reversed course, allowing these super-pollutants to remain in circulation. The result: more trapped heat, more extreme weather, and more strain on public health systems already stretched thin. By weakening emissions standards, the GOP enabled a projected 100 million additional asthma attacks over 25 years—more than 10,000 per day. These aren’t numbers. They’re children gasping for breath in schoolyards, and elders are rushed to emergency rooms. Trump also proposed eliminating the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, which would allow major polluters to stop tracking their emissions altogether. This gutted transparency and crippled enforcement—leaving communities in the dark about the toxins in their air.

These weren’t bureaucratic tweaks. They were calculated reversals of protections that parents, teachers, and frontline advocates fought for over generations. The result: more cancer, more asthma, more heat-related deaths, and less accountability. The GOP didn’t just enable this damage—they orchestrated it. And they did so knowing the consequences.

Leading the charge were Senate Republicans like John Barrasso of Wyoming, who pushed to rescind clean energy authorizations; Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who blocked climate funding; Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, who defended fossil fuel deregulation; and Steve Daines of Montana, who supported expanded drilling. In the House, Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington chaired the Energy and Commerce Committee and helped draft the deregulatory bill. Kevin McCarthy, then Speaker, ensured its passage. Even swing-district Republicans like Jen Kiggans, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Mike Lawler voted for the bill—then scrambled to soften its impact.

This wasn’t just policy. It was a pollution pact. The oil and gas industry spent over $445 million in the last election cycle to influence Trump and Congress, including $96 million on Trump’s re-election campaign. The Department of Justice under Trump filed lawsuits against states like Vermont and New York for trying to hold fossil fuel companies accountable. The GOP didn’t just deregulate—they shielded polluters from consequences.

While Newsom travels abroad to build climate coalitions, Trump and the GOP drag America backward into a fossil-first future. Their deregulation spree isn’t just ideological. It’s lethal. The air is thicker. The costs are higher. The science is silenced. The damage is real—and it’s national.

This moment isn’t just about policy—it’s about legacy. The decisions made today will echo through the lives of our children and their children. Every deregulated pollutant, every blocked climate fund, every silenced scientist is a debt passed down to future generations. The asthma attacks projected over the next 25 years won’t just be statistics—they’ll be lived experiences for millions of kids. The cancer risks from toxic emissions won’t just haunt today’s communities—they’ll shadow tomorrow’s families.

If global climate leadership is dismissed as performative, what do we call abandoning it to expand oil drilling? If showing up to forge solutions is labeled hypocrisy, what do we call gutting protections while claiming to care about American families? Newsom’s presence in Brazil is part of a coordinated effort to reduce emissions worldwide. Trump’s policies, backed by the GOP, are designed to preserve pollution, silence science, and sacrifice public health. One path builds a livable future. The other locks in suffering—for us, for our children, and for every generation that follows.

The policy contrast is stark. Newsom believes climate change is an existential crisis and engages globally to address it. Trump calls it a globalist scam, and the GOP echoes him. Newsom pushes for clean energy and climate neutrality. Trump and the GOP expand fossil fuel infrastructure. Newsom’s rhetoric centers on cooperation and resilience. Trump’s GOP traffics in denial and deregulation. Domestically, Newsom promotes EV incentives and pollution cuts, while the GOP dismantles safeguards and shields polluters.

This isn’t just about two men. It’s about two futures. One where climate action is real, coordinated, and urgent. Another where denial reigns and disaster accelerates. The question isn’t whether Newsom should fly to Brazil. It’s whether our children can survive the consequences of leaders—and a party—who refuse to act.

And the answer? It begins with us. With truth. With courage. With the refusal to let pollution win. The future is still ours to shape. Let’s shape it wisely.

Sources for Further Reading and Verification:

Leave a comment